Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blake Mott vs Christopher Bulus Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mott vs Bulus analysis and find out who is favored!
Blake Mott vs Christopher Bulus Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mott 0 - 0 Bulus
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mott has won 43.64% of points on his second serve, while Bulus has won 56.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mott, in recent form, has won 54.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bulus has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.86% and 26.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mott has saved 52.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bulus has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mott has won 69.01% of matches played (W/L 49/ 22), with Bulus winning 56.25% (W/L 18/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 191/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Bulus has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 16/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 42/ 15), where as Bulus has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mott has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.24 while Bulus has played against players with an average rank of 149.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mott has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bulus has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mott has converted 41.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bulus has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
355
Rank
220
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
58% (224-165)
Career Total W/L
54% (41-35)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$133,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blake Mott | Christopher Bulus |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (36/27) | 56% (18/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (306/286) | 54% (156/132) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 115 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 278.58 | 77.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1249/1766) | 67% (376/562) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (853/1249) | 65% (243/376) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (224/517) | 57% (106/186) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (79/187) | 43% (20/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (748/1827) | 37% (201/542) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (12/6) | 62% (8/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (7/0) |
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
5
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
87%
(
83 of
95)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
51 of
83)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Michael Shaw
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Blake Mott
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
81%
(
78 of
96)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Bulus Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Christopher Bulus
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Bulus
Player
Grigoriy Lomakin
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Christopher Bulus
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Mott Vs Bulus Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
